Posted on 14, Jul

Not to stereotype, but it is generally accepted that many LGBT people love to party, large elaborate parties. The country needs jobs. So why can’t we legalize gay marriage to boost the wedding and hospitality industries? It is private business, requires no government subsidies or stimulus. Sure, some religious conservatives think it is a sin, but so is gluttony and you don’t see them protesting fast food row. This should be a big idea with conservatives.

Continue reading

P&L – The Bottom Line

Posted on 11, Jul

Anyone that has ever managed a company knows the importance of a P&L; it is the Profit and Loss Statement that explains how much money a company made. In the simplest of terms, success is a good P&L, which means taking in more money than you pay out. The primary or “Bottom Line” priority of most businesses is to make the amount of money on the bottom of the P&L as large as possible. You can do that in one of two ways, either increase the money coming in or reduce the money going out; in most cases management woks on both of those processes. This is the heartbeat of our free enterprise system. It works really well if you are selling soda pop, socks and etc.

That model however does not translate well to a number of community supporting services. The profit motive distorts the real needs within the system for things like education, police, fire, correctional facilities and healthcare. For these types of endeavors we should not be looking to have more money at the bottom of a report. When you attach a “For Profit” entity it changes the processes and motivations. By its very nature, the types of pricing and cost cutting done in private businesses do not provide a higher level of service, especially when you add in the need for money to be left over when the process is completed.

A number of power brokers look at the money being spent on providing services and say something to the effect, “I want a piece of that.” Look at the people financing the move to privatize social security. There is a lie being told that private business practices will improve efficiency and reduce costs of government services. Hell, they often don’t even work for business. Walk through the average mall and take note of the empty spaces. Is that how we want our essential services provided?

We need models where all of the costs are covered, including payroll, and the income required to support it is minimal. I am okay with government doing that. Regardless of populist thinking, considering the scale, budgetary constraints and other obstacles, government in most cases does pretty darn good job. If you can’t trust government to do those things then perhaps we should look at possible “Not for Profit” solutions. In either case, I cannot get behind turning those types of services over to private corporations.

Profits drive our economy, and are a good thing. However they are fundamentally juxtaposed to the needs of providing basic human and community services.



Continue reading

Founding Fathers

Posted on 19, Jun

Okay, so some folks want to go back to the principles of our founding fathers, who by the way were a bunch of white guys with long hair (often wigs) and ruffles that thought women and people that did not own property should not vote and that it was proper for one human to own another.

Our freedoms have more to do with our willingness to amend and update our governing principles than they do with adherence to a set of original concepts. The majority will never acknowledge the rights of the few unless the minority is willing to stand up and demand that it be done.


Continue reading

One Finger

Posted on 2, Jun

Do you pay any attention to international news? If so, you may have picked up on the themes that run through unrest in many places. The vast majority of developed countries have extreme unemployment problems. While the causes run much deeper, that issue has become a catalyst in movements against immigrants and other undesirable people. In many places people in a minority (religious, race, sexual, and/or political) are forced to flee in fear of losing their lives.

I think we all come equipped with a compassion-counter; it is a device for measuring our concern and empathy for others. When compassion gets dangerously low it emits an alarm, a sound that gets louder as compassion levels decrease; mine is currently deafening.

When I hear people in our own country ranting about immigrants, gays and etc., I instinctively connect the dots with world events. When I hear people supporting the rights of the super rich at the expense of the lower economic strata, my heart cries tears of anger.

I am unable to change anyone’s heart or mind and I cannot change the course of human events; I can however add my voice in opposition. I think of it like driving. I can’t take idiot drivers off the road; though, I can honk my horn, flash my light and make hand signal to notify folks that their actions are not acceptable.

My essays, poetry and in some ways comedy are all part of that signaling process. So as metaphor, rather than shaking a fist in anger, I’ll simply raise one finger as a signal that compassion levels need to be addressed.


Continue reading

What is next, a gas chamber?

Posted on 24, May

A Baptist pastor recently suggested that “lesbians and queers” be put inside electric fences until they die off. Concentration camps? What is next, a gas chamber?

This type of attitude, while often unspoken, is pervasive. It is why we must fight to establish and preserve the rights of LGBT individuals; too many people feel gays have no right to exist, let alone live free and fulfilling lives. To make it worse, they pronounce that God has given them the right to oppress and abuse people that practice homosexuality.

It does not matter whether or not the majority agrees with or supports a gay lifestyle; homosexuals are people that deserve the same human rights as anyone else. Many people will always and forever do things others dislike or find distasteful, that does not mean free people don’t have the right to do them.

You don’t have to be gay to support gay rights; you need only be respectful of all people, accept their personal choices as their private business, and appreciate their contributions to our society. This will be a major issue throughout the election season. If an LGBT person has ever touched your life in a positive way, please be willing to take a stand to support them.

The oppressors can win only if supporters remain silent.






Continue reading

You Need to Find a Better God

Posted on 11, May

I am really tired of the BS that gets passed around about the threats associated with gay marriage. The arguments against it are all based on a foundation of outdated religious beliefs; there are no compelling social, economic or ethical mandates against it except those based in dogma. Gay marriage is not bestiality, it is not polygamy, is not prostitution and it does not threaten “Traditional” marriage. The unspoken fact is that traditional marriage is a ceremony that gave religion’s, and by proxy God’s, permission for two people to have sex. We have dismissed that as a civil social standard long ago. We don’t in most cases condone sex as commerce and never sanction forced sexual assaults, but if two consenting adults want to have sex we let them. When was the last time you heard of a person being jailed for adultery? Hell, in some cases it seems to be a prerequisite to run for public office. This is no longer an issue of giving permission to have sexual interactions.

This is an issue of civil rights and social responsibility. God will not punish innocent people with tragedy, war and disaster because two people in love with each other make a public and legal commitment; if you think he will, you need to find a better God. We are not living in the Dark Ages; if you believe in that sort of crap, gay marriage is the least of your worries. It does not matter if you think homosexuality is a sin, many faiths and atheists accept it; just because your religion does not condone it that doesn’t mean you get to trump the beliefs of others that don’t have a problem with it.

Oh, and anyone that has cheated on their spouse and/or been divorced has no credibility in speaking about preserving the “Sanctity” of marriage.

Even if you will never consider doing it yourself, or if the thought revolts and offends you, in a “free country” there is no basis for denying another person or persons the right to make that choice and have it recognized as a legal status.

Continue reading

Health Care Defense

Posted on 15, Apr

This is a thought that has been rolling around in my head; why isn’t health care part of the national defense budget? Aren’t our military leaders and politicians sworn to protect us from all enemies without and within? I would love to see someone run the numbers on it, but I feel it is not a stretch to say that more Americans have died from a lack of health care and poor nutrition than have perished by terrorist guns and bombs.

Which is the real threat? How many billions have been spent on defense? Wouldn’t a small portion of that cover every person in this country with modern health and nutrition services? I think we need to halt military spending, not spend another dollar on a plane, ship, gun or bomb until every person in the country has appropriate health care and enough to eat.

Maybe I’m too silly or dumb to understand our national priorities, but it makes sense to me.


Continue reading

Date Night

Posted on 8, Mar

Continue reading

(This note was emailed to the White House on 10/09/11)

Dear Mr. President,

I am very concerned about the rate of unemployment, my personal rate which has been at 100% for more than 2.5 years. None of the current proposals seem to include me or the thousands of other people in my position.

Though I had a successful career, I cannot elicit a response, let alone an interview from potential employers. Because of age (late fifties) and time unemployed, I am statistically unemployable. Building roads and bridges or similar activities will not create opportunity for many of us in the unemployment pool; we need options that will utilize our professional and creative talents.

I have three suggestions:

First, it might be helpful to have a national arts foundation feature work created by the unemployed. I believe the funding to do this would be minimal. A project of this nature would raise the awareness of the vast pool of talent that is being wasted during this struggling economic challenge.

Second, we could use the mind-pool of skills and expertise among the unemployed to create non-partisan local and regional think tanks to advise government and business. Because many of us do not have the money to influence campaigns, our voices appear to go unheard. These people would draw on their backgrounds to help guide processes about creating jobs, but also be a resource to assist small and medium business with a level of talent they normally could not afford. They would also provide feedback to government as to the effectiveness of their efforts.

The bottom line is that we need to reposition the vision of the unemployed from that of social rejects or victims to one of sweet ripe fruit withering on the vine while it waits to be picked. We need less talk about job creators and more promotion of the people and skills that truly are the low hanging fruit in this economy. There is nothing conservative or progressive about this; it is simply a people issue. Do you remember the news story about the man with “the voice” on a street corner? He gets on the news and suddenly has job offers. Why can’t we have a private/government program to highlight the tens of thousands of other talented folks that are being ignored? It might be advantageous to make businesses feel smart for snapping up previously underutilized talent.

Chrystine Julian


Continue reading

Sticks & Stones

Posted on 11, Aug

I am going to cut against the grain with this one, but this is a hot button issue for me, and I accept that I may be alone.

Frankly, I am bit annoyed at self-appointed lexicon police type people. I have recently been part of a discussion concerning people with special needs and the term(s) we use to identify them.

Disabled people become people with disabilities who then become people with special needs. How long before Special Needs becomes a negative term? You think not? What images are evoked by the term special ed or children on the little bus? I see a progression from cripple (crip), to handicapped, to disabled, to special needs. Each transition was intended to take away the stigma attached to the previous word. Are we preparing the next politically correct term to be used when special needs becomes associated with the stereotypes of those groups?

In my life I have watched the transition where “old people” became a negative term because it evoked images of people that were frail. In turn the term “elderly” was adopted until that term became associated with old people. So instead of “elderly”, people wanted to be called “seniors”, until that term was tied to images of old people, so the term “active seniors” became the catch phrase.

Or think of Indians – American Indians – Native Americans – First Peoples

There is no end to the progression once we take that route.

During the United States war for independence the British often called colonists Yankees, which was a derogatory term with a meaning similar to a modern day yokel or hillbilly. Instead of complaining, the colonists took it on with pride and redefined the word.

To me it is more important to teach people how to take pride in themselves, once they have done that any name they are called will be a symbol of esteem.

I think that all people deserve respect, but that respect is better demonstrated by our eye contact, listening, and individual attention much more than by the monikers we choose to use. I believe in the age old truth that how you say it is more important that what is said.

I prefer to be called a “drummer” instead of “a person with a drum”, though some people may feel the second is more accurate. Part of why I drum and do drum circles is because within that space we are only an expression of rhythm; labels, stereotypes and distinctions seem for a time to fade away.

There is nothing wrong with being sensitive to people’s feelings and doing our best to choose a vocabulary that is appropriate. My angst is not with any individual, but rather with some of the underlying principles.

Someone mentioned the concept that a person or group of people can choose/use a name for themselves that if used by an outsider it is considered an insult. I recall a line from a Joe Jackson song that said, “Don’t call me a fag unless you’re a friend.”

As a younger person I had a job selling shoes in a department store. One day a mother brought her wheelchair bound daughter in for new shoes. The girl’s body was twisted by one of the devastating muscular disorders. Another woman, dressed in a sequined sweatshirt and horn rimmed glasses approached the girl and told her that she had no right to be out in public and that her appearance was offensive. The mother and young girl were unaffected by the comments.

I had an amazing experience fitting the girl with shoes. When I looked at her contorted body I saw a crippled person, but when my focus was limited to her feet and I listened to her speak I saw a normal young girl. Since that day I have tried to see that “soul” in everyone I meet.

In a polite society it is important to avoid deliberately using terms that people will take exception to. Though, I’ve seen many cases where it was not the person suffering from a condition that was offended, but rather some “do-gooder” who wants the power to set the names. I honestly feel that many people are not offended until someone else tells them they should be.

Remember the old adage about sticks and stones? Sticks and stones may break my bones but words will never hurt me. There is a core issue here; to me, (again maybe only to me), being offended is a personal choice. If we want to take offense, anything will do. I recall hearing about a lawsuit over a racial slur because someone called a woman a “fat cow.” By contrast, if we choose to stand in our own power the slurs will roll off with no effect.

In a world where people are offended by terms from Uncle Remus or cartoons of spiritual figures, we need to make a shift. Call me anything you wish; if it is inappropriate I may consider you to be stupid, but under no conditions will I ever give you the power to offend me. If more folks adopted that attitude I think the world would be a much happier place.

Continue reading